<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Complete List of XML-RPC PING Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quietaffiliate.com/a-complete-list-of-xml-rpc-ping-services/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quietaffiliate.com/a-complete-list-of-xml-rpc-ping-services</link>
	<description>Silently Making Money Online Since 1997</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 06:17:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quiet Affiliate</title>
		<link>http://www.quietaffiliate.com/a-complete-list-of-xml-rpc-ping-services/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet Affiliate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quietaffiliate.com/?p=57#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Well, as i tried to hint at in the post, everyone has a diff. opinion on the value of pinging these various services, whether its in using them in general or for specific purposes (i.e. pinging your sitemap which might feature new domains that you&#039;re trying to get indexed quickly), etc...

My personal two cents is that if you&#039;re already using any of the hundreds of blog or CMS platforms out there which already ping the main sources like google/yahoo/msn upon site updates (or better yet will ping one of the services listed above which actually notify multiple sites with that single ping), then i&#039;d say there&#039;s no real benefit to re-pinging these sites. If you&#039;ve got content, esp. if it&#039;s new (even better if it&#039;s new AND unique), then the spiders will pick-up on it + spread the gospel for u. 

But as a very short answer to those of you with homegrown sites or those who want just the easiest method of using xml-rpc... yes, i&#039;d say just use pingler. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as i tried to hint at in the post, everyone has a diff. opinion on the value of pinging these various services, whether its in using them in general or for specific purposes (i.e. pinging your sitemap which might feature new domains that you&#8217;re trying to get indexed quickly), etc&#8230;</p>
<p>My personal two cents is that if you&#8217;re already using any of the hundreds of blog or CMS platforms out there which already ping the main sources like google/yahoo/msn upon site updates (or better yet will ping one of the services listed above which actually notify multiple sites with that single ping), then i&#8217;d say there&#8217;s no real benefit to re-pinging these sites. If you&#8217;ve got content, esp. if it&#8217;s new (even better if it&#8217;s new AND unique), then the spiders will pick-up on it + spread the gospel for u. </p>
<p>But as a very short answer to those of you with homegrown sites or those who want just the easiest method of using xml-rpc&#8230; yes, i&#8217;d say just use pingler. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Todd - Inside Affiliate</title>
		<link>http://www.quietaffiliate.com/a-complete-list-of-xml-rpc-ping-services/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Todd - Inside Affiliate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quietaffiliate.com/?p=57#comment-12</guid>
		<description>So would you recommend just using Pingler then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So would you recommend just using Pingler then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
